Topic: Tag Implication: muffet -> female

Implicating muffet → female
Link to implication

Reason:

She's female …

Any character-specific tag implications other than the series they belong to don't work out well.

Imagine if we implicated male to Fox McCloud. Images like this would be false.

post #524830

Another example would be if we implicated human to Samus Aran.

post #167290

Knotty_Curls said:
post #167290

That's a horse wearing power armor. For some reason, we tag it with the same thing as the blonde bombshell in the blue bodysuit.

Tags are weird.

how about...THIS

post #746006

or THIS

post #481975

bad implication because of crossgender

absolutely nothing stops people drawing her as male or with dick

Knotty_Curls said:
Any character-specific tag implications other than the series they belong to don't work out well.

Imagine if we implicated male to Fox McCloud. Images like this would be false.

post #524830

Another example would be if we implicated human to Samus Aran.

post #167290

If things went my way (multitag aliases and implications, metatags in implications, etc.), this wouldn't be a problem. You could just do "fox_mccloud -gender_bender [Or equivalent] -i-> male", as well as "fox_mccloud -species_bender [Or equivalent] -i-> spec:fox".

This would make these arguments about not implicating character to gender/species MUCH shorter, because it would be a thing, and we can just either add it if we don't have it, or say "We already have that" if we do.

And I know, the fact that noobs undertag things makes this more of a hassle, as they generally don't tag everything that's needed to make it work. And in the hands of the average tagger, this is almost redundant, as they usually tag species/gender anyways. We could, however, add a new type of tag that is used solely for implication and alias purposes: The Hidden tag type. It only shows up while editing tags (Meaning it doesn't show up on the tag panel on the left), and is used in implications as a sort of gate, giving experienced users more assistance in their duties (Hey, sometimes you forget to tag the gender, we all make mistakes), while at the same time not assisting those who don't know how to properly use it. For example, the hidden tag hidden:enablegenspecimp, short for Enable Gender/Species Implications, could be added to the implications, thus making them "fox_mccloud hidden:enablegenspecimp -gender_bender -i-> male" and "fox_mccloud hidden:enablegenspecimp -species_bender -i-> spec:fox".

Under settings, the Uploaded Tags box can contain all of the hidden tags you know about, and thus make it easier to use them, as any picture you have already uploaded will contain those hidden tags, so you will not need to type them in, and you can get to work. The wiki page for each hidden tag would contain instructions on the proper use of that tag, so for example, hidden:enablegenspecimp would contain instructions that say that for each character that has implications to gender or species, it will automatically add those, but if the character is not their usual gender or species, the tagger is to add either gender_bender, for gender, or species_bender, for species.

Denied because we don't imply characters to gender tags (or really any general tags).