Implicating tail_clothing → furgonomics
Link to implication
Reason:
Clothing that accounts for tails is a subset of clothing that accounts for furry features.
Updated by user 59725
Topic: Tag Implication: tail_clothing -> furgonomics
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
That seems pretty solid.
There's also the similar tail_button_bottoms which could go into this as well. Edit: I just noticed forum #177705. That might work as well.
Updated by anonymous
Yeah, either way works. I just figured tail_button_bottoms and tail_clothing were redundant.
Updated by anonymous
Maxpizzle said:
Yeah, either way works. I just figured tail_button_bottoms and tail_clothing were redundant.
I'm going to go ahead and imply it instead, since it's a pretty common subtype.
OP approved - See also forum #177705
Updated by anonymous