Implicating pink_topwear → clothing
Link to implication
Reason:
Not yet implied.
And just to save time, I also noticed purple_bottomwear and tight_bottomwear.
I also noticed sash lacked the clothing implication.
Updated by Genjar
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating pink_topwear → clothing
Link to implication
Not yet implied.
And just to save time, I also noticed purple_bottomwear and tight_bottomwear.
I also noticed sash lacked the clothing implication.
Updated by Genjar
I've actually been hoping to nuke these at some point.
Updated by anonymous
parasprite said:
some point.
Anyone want to discuss these?
Updated by anonymous
Hudson said:
Anyone want to discuss these?
"these" being all of the (color)_(clothing_category) tags, and potentially nuking them?
I don't have a strong opinion myself, just want to be clear.
Updated by anonymous
Useless tags aren't harmful, so don't try to get rid of them.
Updated by anonymous
Hudson said:
Anyone want to discuss these?
It's kind of drastic.
I'd still prefer aliasing the clothing colors to broad categories (<color>_footwear, <color>_headwear, this one, etc) instead of nuking them altogether. At least for now. If that doesn't work out, those could always be nuked later.
Updated by anonymous