Topic: Tag Implication: ballbusting -> balls

Implicating ballbusting → balls
Link to implication

Reason:

additionally:

cock_and_ball_torture -> balls
cock_and_ball_torture -> torture
ball_growth -> balls
ball_lick -> balls
ball_nuzzling -> balls
ball_nuzzling -> nuzzling
ball_sitting -> balls
ball_suck -> balls
ball_tugging -> balls
hairy_balls -> balls
hairy_balls -> pubes
veiny_balls -> balls
veiny_balls -> vein
ball_tuft -> balls
ball_tuft -> tuft

Can't a crotch get kicked when someone is wearing clothing that covers their balls?

-1 for ballbusting -> balls because balls are not always visible in ballbusting image but it can still be obviously ballbusting. balls cannot be tagged on images where existence of balls is only implied (like clothed character getting kicked in crotch).

-1 for cock_and_ball_torture → balls because the tag doesnt mean torture that contains both cock torture and ball torture in every image, its just a name for the male genitalia torture fetish content. so it can contain only penis torture or only ball torture.

-1 for hairy_balls → pubes because i dont believe that hairy balls are something a person is looking for when they search for pubes

I agree with all of them except for the ones Mutisija mentioned.

Except hairy_balls ->pubes. Nuthair is definitely pubic hair

Mutisija said:
-1 for ballbusting -> balls because balls are not always visible in ballbusting image but it can still be obviously ballbusting. balls cannot be tagged on images where existence of balls is only implied (like clothed character getting kicked in crotch).

the high majority do depict the balls unclothed thru so it may be suggested that there be a diference made between nude_ballbusting and clothed_ballbusting.

Also kinda ironic that you cant tag implied balls but you can tag implied penis or pussy by defaulting to female or male when it is ambiguous if the character is intersex or binary...

-1 for cock_and_ball_torture → balls because the tag doesnt mean torture that contains both cock torture and ball torture in every image, its just a name for the male genitalia torture fetish content. so it can contain only penis torture or only ball torture.

hmm... do agree on this one.

-1 for hairy_balls → pubes because i dont believe that hairy balls are something a person is looking for when they search for pubes

If anything that would be what they are looking for, the only other pubic hair would be butt_hair, pussy_hair and abdominal_hair(the hair just above the penis)/landing_strip(female equivalent) and characters dont always have both so differentiation might be worthwhile.

What about the term "ball-buster", like someone who yells at someone for something they did? Or "busting someone's balls"? The things you listed would imply that the post behind the tag is NSFW automatically, even though not all ball-busting is.

Nikolaithefur said:
What about the term "ball-buster", like someone who yells at someone for something they did? Or "busting someone's balls"? The things you listed would imply that the post behind the tag is NSFW automatically, even though not all ball-busting is.

that would probly be covered under dialogue or yelling rather then any of the listed tags here :? pardon if i didnt quite understand you completly.

Ruku said:
Also kinda ironic that you cant tag implied balls but you can tag implied penis or pussy by defaulting to female or male when it is ambiguous if the character is intersex or binary...

..what

Ruku said:
Also kinda ironic that you cant tag implied balls but you can tag implied penis or pussy by defaulting to female or male when it is ambiguous if the character is intersex or binary...

Uh, no? Male doesn't imply penis, and female doesn't imply pussy.

Jackalfag said:
Uh, no? Male doesn't imply penis, and female doesn't imply pussy.

As said just above your post and mutisijas, you do imply by defaulting to male or female when the sex is actually ambiguous.

Ruku said:
As said just above your post and mutisijas, you do imply by defaulting to male or female when the sex is actually ambiguous.

Not from a tagging perspective.

Jackalfag said:
Uh, no? Male doesn't imply penis, and female doesn't imply pussy.

Please don't take this the wrong way, but I don't want to see girls in my posts, so I blacklist pussy and vagina, which implies girls/females, along with a few other female-related tags. I haven't seen a girl in my feed for months, so I'd say a large majority of users think the same way as I do when it comes to tagging. You can try to bring gender identity into the mix, but this website has a policy of "tag-what-you-see", not "tag-what-you-feel".

Nikolaithefur said:
Please don't take this the wrong way, but I don't want to see girls in my posts, so I blacklist pussy and vagina, which implies girls/females, along with a few other female-related tags. I haven't seen a girl in my feed for months, so I'd say a large majority of users think the same way as I do when it comes to tagging. You can try to bring gender identity into the mix, but this website has a policy of "tag-what-you-see", not "tag-what-you-feel".

lol
that has nothing to do with gender identity
A female being present in an image doesn't strictly mean a pussy will be visible (and thus tagged), and the same applies to males and dicks.

Jackalfag said:
lol
that has nothing to do with gender identity
A female being present in an image doesn't strictly mean a pussy will be visible (and thus tagged), and the same applies to males and dicks.

As I've been shut down for earlier. Apparently e6 doesn't tag gender. They tag sex. Otherwise they'd be fine with things like trans tags clearly.

Jackalfag said:
lol
that has nothing to do with gender identity
A female being present in an image doesn't strictly mean a pussy will be visible (and thus tagged), and the same applies to males and dicks.

how do you know if its female thou if you cant see the genitalia?
, most herms do have breasts as well, this is the point im making you imply its female when it can bee anything other then.

Ruku said:
how do you know if its female thou if you cant see the genitalia?
, most herms do have breasts as well, this is the point im making you imply its female when it can bee anything other then.

As you have been told already : We tag what we see, not what we don't see. If a character looks female, then we tag female. We can't say a character "looks hermaphrodite" unless there's a sign that both are present, such as a cock bulge and breasts.

Furrin_Gok said:
As you have been told already : We tag what we see, not what we don't see. If a character looks female, then we tag female. We can't say a character "looks hermaphrodite" unless there's a sign that both are present, such as a cock bulge and breasts.

Cock bulge isn't a good representation. How you know it's a cock bulge and not a hyper pussy bulge or the result of a dogina in heat?

There are a million different reasons why tag what you see is a fundamentally flawed system. This is one of them.

What defines what "looks" female? In recent history there have been a lot of artworks tagged cboy, pissing off the artist or character owner, when it's just a flat_chested_female.

There needs to be more clear distinction than just some guy saying "hey I think this looks this one way so that means it is."

Either way.

This is horrendously off topic. Were talking about balls here not gender studies.