Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #40243 balls_on_face -> balls has been approved.
Reason: I mean, if we can see balls on someone’s face, we can see balls right?
EDIT: The tag implication balls_on_face -> balls (forum #312783) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
feldnir said:
The tag implication #40243 balls_on_face -> balls has been approved.Reason: I mean, if we can see balls on someone’s face, we can see balls right?
Yeah, your statement makes sense, but some people actually use the balls_on_face tag. Many people (including me, haha) like posts that include ball licking or ball smelling, and I would not be so happy when I see the tag removed. :(
ajaxengine said:
Yeah, your statement makes sense, but some people actually use the balls_on_face tag. Many people (including me, haha) like posts that include ball licking or ball smelling, and I would not be so happy when I see the tag removed. :(
The tag is not getting removed. This is an implication request, not an alias.
An implication means that every time the balls_on_face tag gets added to a post, the balls tag will also get added automatically.
these aren't my glasses
bitwolfy said:
The tag is not getting removed. This is an implication request, not an alias.
An implication means that every time the balls_on_face tag gets added to a post, the balls tag will also get added automatically.
That's good to hear! I joined e621 recently and I don't know much about the website. I thought tag implications were cojoining two tags and generalizing it. Anyway, thanks for the info! :>
The tag implication balls_on_face -> balls (forum #312783) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.
