Topic: Is this memes? (BUR)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Errorist

Member

The bulk update request #9398 is pending approval.

create implication batkini (115) -> meme_clothing (6953)
create implication sharkini (105) -> meme_clothing (6953)
create alias drawyourfursona (498) -> meme_clothing (6953)
create implication hot_singles_in_your_area (30) -> meme (66132)
create implication is_for_me? (7) -> meme (66132)
create implication draw_the_squad (12) -> meme (66132)
create implication steve_is_drowning (1) -> meme (66132)
create implication it's_my_sleepover_and_i_get_to_choose_the_movie (1) -> meme (66132)
create implication toothless_dancing (35) -> meme (66132)
create implication dancing_lizard (9) -> meme (66132)
create implication girlsmell_particles (40) -> meme (66132)
create implication the_cooler_daniel (6) -> meme (66132)
create implication are_ya_winning_son? (96) -> meme (66132)
create implication hello_x_from_y (5) -> meme (66132)
create implication a_deer_is_sucking_off_another_deer (8) -> meme (66132)
create implication which_side_are_you_on (3) -> meme (66132)
create implication touch_the_cow_do_it_now (13) -> meme (66132)
create implication get_stickbugged_lol (42) -> meme (66132)
create implication tiny_rabbit_is_obsessed_with_giant_girlfriend (24) -> meme (66132)
create implication nah_i'd_win (51) -> meme (66132)
create implication oblivious_woman_playing_video_games (5) -> meme (66132)
create implication yummy_rain_(meme) (27) -> meme (66132)
create implication he_just_nut_in_me_and_started_playing (37) -> meme (66132)
create implication mexico_alien_(meme) (45) -> meme (66132)
create implication why_do_they_call_it_oven? (17) -> meme (66132)

Reason: "Drawyourfursona" started out as an alternate tag for the Twitter hoodie but then it took on a life of its own. The rest of these should be self explanatory. Feel free to add any I missed!

Watsit

Privileged

errorist said:
Reason: "Drawyourfursona" started out as an alternate tag for the Twitter hoodie but then it took on a life of its own.

Aliasing it to meme_clothing doesn't make sense since not all uses are meme clothing, or even have clothing at all:
post #4794341 post #4286451 post #4135128 post #3084678
The name doesn't indicate it's for anything clothing-related either.

Errorist

Member

Well, I have no idea what those four are even supposed to be. Is it necessary to have a tag for "person drew this thing in response to an explicit prompt to do so and not just because it's a trend" specifically? Because I brought up the idea of a drawing_prompt tag for that at one point and it didn't go over well.

Watsit

Privileged

errorist said:
Well, I have no idea what those four are even supposed to be. Is it necessary to have a tag for "person drew this thing in response to an explicit prompt to do so and not just because it's a trend" specifically? Because I brought up the idea of a drawing_prompt tag for that at one point and it didn't go over well.

I don't even think it's necessary to have a tag for "person drew this thing because it's a trend", and memes should be held to a higher standard where there's something intrinsic to the idea that makes it unique or bordering on absurd and not something people would otherwise think to draw on their own. For instance, there's nothing that unique about a character wearing a hoodie and underwear, it's entirely possible for people to draw characters like that without being aware of any trend. It shouldn't be able to apply retroactively to pre-existing images, or to images made without any awareness to the trend/meme, IMO.

Errorist

Member

Bump because I have been gradually adding to this list over the course of the last few months, every time I find a new meme tag that doesn't imply meme yet. Feel free to chime in with any others you know of, or make a mental note to pop back in here and mention them whenever you find one.

Errorist

Member

The bulk update request #12047 is pending approval.

create implication too_serious (24) -> meme (66132)
create implication spider-man_pointing_at_spider-man (46) -> meme (66132)
create implication rikka's_finger_spin (6) -> meme (66132)
create implication why_is_it_empty (3) -> meme (66132)
create implication would_you_still_love_me_if_i_was_a_worm_(meme) (17) -> meme (66132)
create implication don't_bully_me_i'll_cum (59) -> meme_clothing (6953)
create implication i'm_full_of_cum (70) -> meme_clothing (6953)
remove implication rental_mommy (170) -> meme (66132)
create implication rental_mommy (170) -> meme_clothing (6953)
remove implication women_want_me_fish_fear_me (57) -> meme (66132)
create implication women_want_me_fish_fear_me (57) -> meme_clothing (6953)
create implication garfield_thrown_out_of_the_window_(meme) (14) -> meme (66132)
create implication scream_at_own_ass (2) -> meme (66132)
create implication it_fucken_wimdy (30) -> meme (66132)
create implication hasn't_kissed_anyone_ever_vs_expecting_a_kiss_with_tongue_(meme) (18) -> meme (66132)
create implication merr_chrismas (24) -> meme (66132)
create implication yeah_we_gay_keep_scrolling (19) -> meme (66132)
create implication i_guess (4) -> meme (66132)
create implication but_i_poop_from_there (3) -> meme (66132)
create implication tom_reading_the_newspaper (21) -> meme (66132)
create implication brooklyn_sweater (154) -> meme_clothing (6953)
create implication rolls_worst_joint_ever (2) -> meme (66132)
create implication sugoi_dekai (44) -> meme_clothing (6953)
remove implication mega_milk (400) -> meme (66132)
create implication mega_milk (400) -> meme_clothing (6953)

Reason: Ran out of slots, starting a new set. Feel free to weigh in on the first set now; I can just as easily remove lines after the fact as I added them.

Errorist

Member

These two are already set to imply meme so I think that'll need to be removed before this part can run:

implicate rental_mommy -> meme_clothing
implicate women_want_me_fish_fear_me -> meme_clothing

SNPtheCat

Member

errorist said:
These two are already set to imply meme so I think that'll need to be removed before this part can run:

implicate rental_mommy -> meme_clothing
implicate women_want_me_fish_fear_me -> meme_clothing

No, they can be run in tandem. Meme doesn't imply meme_clothing after all

Errorist

Member

Huh. For some reason I thought the system rejects requests that create an A->B, B->C, A->C relationship because it would result in A implying C twice. But it worked. Should I include the A->C removal in the script anyway? I don't think any of the other meme_clothing tags imply meme directly.

SNPtheCat

Member

errorist said:
Huh. For some reason I thought the system rejects requests that create an A->B, B->C, A->C relationship because it would result in A implying C twice. But it worked. Should I include the A->C removal in the script anyway? I don't think any of the other meme_clothing tags imply meme directly.

You should remove A->C.
The system stops you from making the implication A->C if A->B & B->C, But you can imply both A->B and B->C when A->C is in place

Clawstripe

Janitor

errorist said:
Should I include the A->C removal in the script anyway?

It would probably be a good idea. Not only would it keep things from getting convoluted, but would make things easier should we ever need to reshuffle the implications again.

Errorist

Member

The bulk update request #13587 is pending approval.

create implication sweating_towel_guy (64) -> meme (66132)
create implication daily_struggle (15) -> meme (66132)
create implication oh_no_he's_hot_(meme) (16) -> meme (66132)
create implication okay_(meme) (16) -> meme (66132)
create implication levitating_pizza (40) -> meme (66132)

Reason: Round three, somehow! Parts one and two are now locked in as far as additions go, but this one might have more to come.