Topic: [REJECTED] Body parts in ass implications

The bulk update request #12692 has been rejected.

create implication foot_in_ass (58) -> body_part_in_ass (1)
create implication toes_in_ass (0) -> body_part_in_ass (1)
create implication anal_fisting (2975) -> body_part_in_ass (1)
create implication penis_in_ass (126863) -> body_part_in_ass (1)
create implication tail_in_ass (2354) -> body_part_in_ass (1)
create implication tentacle_in_ass (6963) -> body_part_in_ass (1)

Reason: They all body parts and is inside an ass, though i think it would be better if it’s a tag group instead

EDIT: The bulk update request #12692 (forum #473704) has been rejected by @whatismyname1234.

If I remember correctly there was a BUR somewhere that aimed to get rid off the body_part_in_* tags, due to them being unnecessary bloat that was just created by a single user.

demonthedarkhound said:
If I remember correctly there was a BUR somewhere that aimed to get rid off the body_part_in_* tags, due to them being unnecessary bloat that was just created by a single user.

And it seems that only one other user is actively maintaining those tags and almost exclusively applying them only to popular animated posts where the penetrating body part is a penis, making it largely ineffective and pointless.

God no, just get rid of those tags already
They are so utterly useless

They've sat around like a rotting corpse because there's no good alias targets, but at this point we may as well just nuke them

vitreousvice said: […] making it largely ineffective and pointless.

donovan_dmc said:
God no, just get rid of those tags already
They are so utterly useless

Originally I was hesitant to invalidate it, but since there’s support to get rid of it I made a separate BUR: forum #473801

The bulk update request #12692 (forum #473704) has been rejected by @whatismyname1234.