Topic: checked wiki for humanoid_penis and???

Checked humanoid_penis for any info on when you can see the shaft on an obviously human penis on a human but not the glans. But I noticed the tag wasn't for humans at all.

You see, I was looking up 'scalie penis -humanoid_penis' to see examples of scalies with non human penises. I didn't want to use animal_penis since I was afraid it'd be undertagged for some reason. I saw posts with humans (with - you guessed it) and you can see where my thought process went as I now just tagged a bunch of posts with it (i'll be reversing them after this post).

So, I guess I should just be using the other tag - animal_penis, instead. But I also want to know if you guys have any insight on the matter. I guess also using the animal_penis tag would get me posts with an animal_penis but also have a humanoid_penis. Hmm... kind of a nothing post, but I still would like to hear if there are thoughts about this.

dinbyy said:
Checked humanoid_penis for any info on when you can see the shaft on an obviously human penis on a human but not the glans. But I noticed the tag wasn't for humans at all.

that was added by a random user in October with zero prior discussion. in addition it contradicts the direct next line:

This tag should be used for:

• Human, anthro, and feral characters with humanoid penises.

It should be reverted.

This is like saying you shouldn't tag canine_penis for canine because it is the default, and people should tag it generically as penis instead.

dba_afish said:
that was added by a random user in October with zero prior discussion. in addition it contradicts the direct next line:

I see. So what should we go with/keep then?

dinbyy said:
I see. So what should we go with/keep then?

The version before the change, which I have reverted to.

Always check the edit history of a wiki page if something seems out of the ordinary
If someone introduced a change with no given reason and they're practically a total nobody, it would usually be pretty safe to revert their change and move on

Or if you like, send them a message asking why they changed it, if there's a discussion they didn't link, etc etc

I have literally never heard a single person say humanoid penis doesn't apply to humans, I'd bet on the user just assuming the "we don't tag defaults" mentality applies to everything, and just making the executive decision to change the wiki page to reflect their idea of how the tag should work

They have also done same changes to humanoid genitalia and humanoid vulva wikis. I went ahead and reverted the changes.

Good instincts asking about it though OP, & I appreciate the integrity to go back & fix what you believed were mistaken edits.