Topic: Pokémon from Pokémon Winds and Waves BUR

The bulk update request #13384 is active.

create alias generation_10_pokémon (0) -> generation_10_pokemon (576)
create alias generation_x_pokemon (0) -> generation_10_pokemon (576)
create alias generation_x_pokémon (0) -> generation_10_pokemon (576)
create implication generation_10_pokemon (576) -> pokemon_(species) (618512)
create implication browt (130) -> generation_10_pokemon (576)
create implication pombon (294) -> generation_10_pokemon (576)
create implication gecqua (326) -> generation_10_pokemon (576)

Reason: Pokémon Winds and Waves were introduced as the tenth generation of Pokémon games scheduled to release in 2027.
Browt, Pombon and Gecqua were the first Generation 10 Pokémon revealed as the starter Pokémon through a Pokémon Presents video presentation in Feb 27th, 2026.

EDIT: The bulk update request #13384 (forum #482442) has been approved by @furrypickle.

If you want to help to tag the missing implications for the revealed Pokémon from Pokémon Winds and Waves, here are some tag search links:
~browt ~pombon ~gecqua -generation_10_pokemon
~browt ~pombon ~gecqua -pokemon_(species)

Yup, all of these implications and aliases should be made asap, so anyone who wants to look at art of any of the new three can easily do so, and so that other folks don't need to go back and add the "pokemon_(species)" tag to the plethora of posts that forget to include it (since people are so used to it being added automatically via implication)

Also, the Mega Dimension DLC megas' implications should probably be approved as well - so I hope that BUR won't get forgotten about or skipped over now that we're already starting the tag work for the next generation

The bulk update request #13384 (forum #482442) has been approved by @furrypickle.

The bulk update request #13405 is active.

create implication mr._windychu (52) -> pokemon (622778)
create implication ms._wavychu (107) -> pokemon (622778)
create alias mr_windychu (0) -> mr._windychu (52)
create alias ms_wavychu (0) -> ms._wavychu (107)

Reason: They appear to be regular generation 1 pikachu, and are introduced in generation 10, but as characters I imagine that implying either is a bad idea.

EDIT: The bulk update request #13405 (forum #482821) has been approved by @spe.

pokemon_winds_and_waves is being aliased away since we don't tag the individual mainline games, so the implications would be a problem. They should just imply pokemon instead.

watsit said:
pokemon_winds_and_waves is being aliased away since we don't tag the individual mainline games, so the implications would be a problem. They should just imply pokemon instead.

I mean, officially Let's Go, LArc and PLZA are considered main series games (for some reason), and we have tags for those.

but yeah, I feel like the main main series titles have too many characters and mechanics and stuff that gets brought over to future generation games for them to really have tags that will remain coherent as time goes on. like, if we had tags for RGBY what would the tag even mean, the art style?

dba_afish said:
I mean, officially Let's Go, LArc and PLZA are considered main series games (for some reason), and we have tags for those.

PLA and PLZA are spinoffs, regardless of what The Pokemon Company calls them. At least with PLA, it's a different type of game, doesn't introduce a new generation, and is a unique setting. I don't know enough about PLZA to speak on it, but if it's not unique enough from the other games to make it stand out from other Pokemon media (beyond the new pokemon or characters in it), I wouldn't contest aliasing it away either. Let's Go probably should also be aliased away, since it's just a remake of Pokemon Yellow (which itself was an alternate version of Pokemon Red and Blue, made to capitalize on the anime in the lead up to Gold and Silver).

watsit said:
pokemon_winds_and_waves is being aliased away since we don't tag the individual mainline games, so the implications would be a problem. They should just imply pokemon instead.

That's a good point, swapped out to pokemon.

The bulk update request #13405 (forum #482821) has been approved by @spe.

The generation_x_pokémon -> generation_10_pokemon (alias #81945) and generation_10_pokémon -> generation_10_pokemon (alias #81943) aliases both failed and need to be rejected, it is impossible to approve these because the tag cannot be created

The tag alias generation_x_pokémon -> generation_10_pokemon has been rejected by @Cinder.

The tag alias generation_10_pokémon -> generation_10_pokemon has been rejected by @Cinder.