Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions
Hello, as some of you may know, I've been posting Fluffy Pony for a few months now.
Some FP characters have cutie mark like MLP characters.
post #6235979 post #4563974
The problem is that afaict MLP shouldn't be tagged on FP posts. So should I tag cutie mark, which implies MLP or shouldn't tag it at all?
usetheblacklist said:
The problem is that afaict MLP shouldn't be tagged on FP posts.
As far as I know, that's only due to Fluffy Ponies not being inherently MLP related. Similar to fakemon not being inherently pokemon related. You don't tag my_little_pony because of fluffy_pony. But if anything MLP-related appears with a fluffy pony, like a cutie_mark, then it's entirely fair to tag my_little_pony along with fluffy_pony.
If a fluffy pony character has a cutie mark (and that concept was specifically created for and used in MLP), could that be considered a crossover? In that case, the issue with using both tags together would be resolved
Oh, and one more silly suggestion — to tag it as something like symbol_on_thigh/symbol_on_butt instead of cutie mark?
notevilfox said:
If a fluffy pony character has a cutie mark (and that concept was specifically created for and used in MLP), could that be considered a crossover? In that case, the issue with using both tags together would be resolved
I thought about this before. I don't think I'm supposed to tag crossover on MLP + FP because the latter is orginated from MLP after all.
notevilfox said:
Oh, and one more silly suggestion — to tag it as something like symbol_on_thigh/symbol_on_butt instead of cutie mark?
That sounds better. I don't want to tag MLP if possible.
