Topic: Thoughts on easy_access related tags?

Currently it seems there are these three related tags:

• easy access: bottomwear modified to allow access to genitals and/or anus
• anal access: bottomwear modified to allow access to the anus only
• full access: bottomwear modified to allow access to both genitals and anus

I think that a fourth 'genital_access' tag could be added for when the access is only the genitals and not the anus, to complete this set of tags. Examples: post #4473994, post #1543576
The combined post count of the above tags is under 1000 and I think I could do some cleanup, properly categorizing them and adding genital_access as well if people seem to be open to the idea.
At some point I'd request a BUR to make easy_access an implication of the other ones.

A potential problem I could see with creating genital_access is when it's not obvious if only the genitals are exposed due to the angle. Like if it's a front view image and you couldn't see if the anus was also exposed, would you tag it genital_access or the broader easy_access? That may be splitting hairs though.

I'm not clear how this is different from crotchless_clothing?

beholding said:
I'm not clear how this is different from crotchless_clothing?

I missed that, thanks for bringing it up. Easy_access seems to be almost the same, though with crotchless_clothing a character could still be wearing underwear beneath crotchless pants or have a featureless crotch.

I looked at a few other (non-furry) boorus and it seems they either alias them to crotchless or they're just not in use.
So I guess now my question is whether or not these tags are in enough use to justify being separate from the more used crotchless_clothing tag.
It could be slightly harder to find anal_access for example with just multi tag searching because not all posts are single-scene solo images.