Topic: Hoppers (Disney) BUR

The bulk update request #13526 is pending approval.

Reason: Character -> Copyright

king_george and grandma_tanaka should probably be given suffixes, since they aren't that unique. Also, the movie's tag should be hoppers_(disney) since the word hoppers can be ambiguous too (see topic #62629).

It's really a trivial thing but I don't really like the inconsistency in the suffix.
It's sometimes _(film) and sometimes _(disney).

Your pending BURs have both _(pixar) and _(disney) too.

ichiko said:
The bulk update request #13526 is pending approval.

create implication hoppers_(disney) (138) -> pixar (3665) # duplicate of implication #72013
create implication mabel_tanaka (38) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication mayor_jerry_generazzo (0) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication samantha_emily_fairfax (1) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication dr._nisha_(hoppers) (0) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication dr._conner_(hoppers) (0) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication grandma_tanaka_(hoppers) (0) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication king_george_(hoppers) (55) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication loaf_(hoppers) (23) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication ellen_(hoppers) (7) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication insect_queen_(hoppers) (11) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication titus_(hoppers) (49) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication ant_queen_(hoppers) (0) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication bird_king_(hoppers) (4) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication fish_queen_(hoppers) (3) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication diane_(hoppers) (1) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication amphibian_king_(hoppers) (4) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication tom_(hoppers) (19) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)
create implication reptile_queens_(hoppers) (4) -> hoppers_(disney) (138)

Reason: Character -> Copyright

Ant king should be aliased to ant queen. It's revealed in the novel version of the movie that it's a she.

I personally prefer that the tag uses pixar as the disambiguator (_(pixar)), not Disney.

The bulk update request #13734 is pending approval.

Reason:

yummytummysketties said:
It's really a trivial thing but I don't really like the inconsistency in the suffix.
It's sometimes _(film) and sometimes _(disney).

Your pending BURs have both _(pixar) and _(disney) too.

alien_fluff said:
I personally prefer that the tag uses pixar as the disambiguator (_(pixar)), not Disney.

Alright let's do this.

The bulk update request #13735 is pending approval.

create alias hopper (5) -> hopper_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias hoppers (0) -> hopper_(disambiguation) (0) # has blocking transitive relationships, cannot be applied through BUR
change category hopper_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid

Reason: From topic #62629

thegreatwolfgang said:
Maybe rename it hoppers_(disney) since the generic term "Hopper"/"Hoppers" can mean a bunch of things, see Wikipedia.

Blocking AIBUR: implication #71585