Topic: When anatomy is square, it's square anatomy

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #13563 is pending approval.

create implication square_breasts (8) -> square_(anatomy) (1112)
create implication square_eyes (94) -> square_(anatomy) (1112)
create implication square_head (957) -> square_(anatomy) (1112)
create implication square_nipples (15) -> square_(anatomy) (1112)
create implication square_pupils (441) -> square_(anatomy) (1112)

Reason: Tagging an image as having a square head might be more intuitive to someone who doesn't know the square_(anatomy) tag exists. This should save some trouble there. Also, to have one without the other feels kind of wrong to me.

should we change 'square_(anatomy)' to 'square_anatomy?' Because the former looks like it refers to a body part called "square."

watsit said:

There's also some that are questionable:
post #4939706 post #3262669
these are a bit more rounded and/or trapezoidal, how square does it need to be to be considered "square"?

I wouldn't call either of those square. The one on the left looks like squinting and in the one on the right other than mistagged square/horizontal pupils I'm not seeing anything that jumps out as square about the eyes.