Topic: Clothed female and Clothed male aliased incorrectly

I may be misunderstanding the intent but I think these tags are aliased to a number of tags they shouldn't be
clothed female and clothed male each seem to be about any/all imaged with one or more individuals being clothed but were aliased to tags like clothed female nude male or clothed male nude female respectively, among many others, which are about a single clothed and single nude individual. This adds a lot of incorrect results when searching any of the Clothed/Nude tags (IE. post #6289192 comes up when searching clothed_female_nude_male despite being a solo, fully clothed female with clothed_female_nude_female bringing up identical results)

It would probably make more sense if the Clothed/Nude tags implied the Clothed female or Clothed male tags but it doesn't seem like they should be aliased like they currently are

You can't search clothed_female_nude_male (and variants) at all, that's the whole point of aliasing them. You're just searching the clothed_female tag instead.

If you would like them to be unaliased, you can create a BUR to do so. People would vote their opinion and discuss it. Be advised however, when these tags were aliased away (topic #43781) there was overwhelming support to do so.

There is the clothed/nude tag with a similar function that you can use.

clothed_female_nude_male was aliased to clothed_female because the fact that you can use multiple tags in a search makes clothed_female_nude_male pointless.

You can search clothed_female nude_male which is functionally identical to clothed_female_nude_male.

secondwind said:
I may be misunderstanding the intent but I think these tags are aliased to a number of tags they shouldn't be
Clothed female -snip-

You're linking to a wrong page.
[[https://e621.net/wiki_pages/59619|Clothed female]] links to https://e621.net/wiki_pages/show_or_new?title=https%3A%2F%2Fe621.net%2Fwiki_pages%2F59619 instead of https://e621.net/wiki_pages/59619

You can instead use either of these.

[[Clothed_female]]
"clothed_female":/wiki_pages/59619

yummytummysketties said:
You're linking to a wrong page.
[[https://e621.net/wiki_pages/59619|Clothed female]] links to https://e621.net/wiki_pages/show_or_new?title=https%3A%2F%2Fe621.net%2Fwiki_pages%2F59619 instead of https://e621.net/wiki_pages/59619

You can instead use either of these.

[[Clothed_female]]
"clothed_female":/wiki_pages/59619

Fixed the wiki links. I used the wrong dtext formatting for them, they should all link properly

emionix said:
You can't search clothed_female_nude_male (and variants) at all, that's the whole point of aliasing them. You're just searching the clothed_female tag instead.

If you would like them to be unaliased, you can create a BUR to do so. People would vote their opinion and discuss it. Be advised however, when these tags were aliased away (topic #43781) there was overwhelming support to do so.

There is the clothed/nude tag with a similar function that you can use.

I think I get it now? Rather than having a tag for every instance of Clothed/Nude it's just different tags used in different combinations for the same function.