Topic: [APPROVED] BUR only ('*_only' tag stuff)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Monsterbomb10010

Member

The bulk update request #116 is active.

remove implication hat_only (13622) -> mostly_nude (152834)
remove implication hat_only (13622) -> headwear (286132)
create implication hat_only (13622) -> hat (261735)
create implication hat_only (13622) -> headwear_only (15422)
create implication headwear_only (15422) -> headwear (286132)
create implication headwear_only (15422) -> mostly_nude (152834)
create implication headwear_only (15422) -> headgear_only (18217)
create implication headgear_only (18217) -> headgear (369551)
create implication helmet_only (1566) -> helmet (36935)
create implication helmet_only (1566) -> headgear_only (18217)
create implication mask_only (1475) -> mask (65105)
create implication mask_only (1475) -> nude (1513149)
create implication sunglasses_only (1527) -> sunglasses (42168)
create implication sunglasses_only (1527) -> eyewear_only (14094)
create implication glasses_only (11114) -> glasses (273625)
create implication eyewear_only (14094) -> nude (1513149)
create implication boots_only (2404) -> boots (97795)
create implication boots_only (2404) -> footwear_only (12161)
create implication sandals_only (346) -> sandals (18045)
create implication sandals_only (346) -> footwear_only (12161)
create implication socks_only (2921) -> socks (79883)
create implication socks_only (2921) -> mostly_nude (152834)
create implication underwear_only (30684) -> underwear (442192)
create implication underwear_only (30684) -> clothed (1421211)
create implication panties_only (4137) -> underwear_only (30684)
create implication panties_only (4137) -> topless (160697)
create implication bra_only (619) -> bra (85684)
create implication bra_only (619) -> underwear_only (30684)
create implication bra_only (619) -> bottomless (191755)
create implication topwear_only (16609) -> topwear (705637)
create implication topwear_only (16609) -> bottomless (191755)
create implication coat_only (300) -> coat (27508)
create implication coat_only (300) -> topwear_only (16609)
create implication shirt_only (6608) -> shirt (419115)
create implication shirt_only (6608) -> topwear_only (16609)
create implication hoodie_only (3410) -> hoodie (65235)
create implication hoodie_only (3410) -> topwear_only (16609)
create implication robe_only (1097) -> robe (24570)
create implication robe_only (1097) -> mostly_nude (152834)
create implication scarf_only (3690) -> mostly_nude (152834)
create implication gloves_only (4608) -> gloves (246919)
create implication gloves_only (4608) -> handwear_only (4952)
create implication handwear_only (4952) -> handwear (259521)
create implication handwear_only (4952) -> mostly_nude (152834)

Reason: When a user gives some *_only tags attention, and nothing else...

Also see implication #29810 (panties_only -> panties)

EDIT: The bulk update request #116 (forum #293104) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

Watsit

Privileged

Shouldn't those aliases be implications? Also hat_only -> hat and helmet_only -> helmet implications would make sense too.

user 187249

Member

+1, and nothing else...

Actually, there is something else. I noticed a few implications missing from the list.

Extra Implications

create implication glasses_only -> glasses
create implication handwear_only -> handwear
create implication panties_only -> panties

I'm also unsure about the eyewear_only/mask_only -> nude implications. I guess it depends whether or not a 'non-clothing_only' tag (collar_only, eyewear_only) and a 'clothing_only' tag (headwear_only, footwear_only) can be used on the same post.

Genjar

Former Staff

strikerman said:
Not mostly nude?

Wondered about that myself. Accessories don't count as clothing, so if masks are accessories then it's nude. But perhaps those should be considered clothing.