Topic: [REJECTED] Imply *_penetrating_* to sex BUR

The bulk update request #1767 has been rejected.

create implication female_penetrating_female (3109) -> sex (1250840)
create implication female_penetrating_intersex (386) -> sex (1250840)
create implication female_penetrating_male (5861) -> sex (1250840)
create implication intersex_penetrating_female (21839) -> sex (1250840)
create implication intersex_penetrating_intersex (6943) -> sex (1250840)
create implication intersex_penetrating_male (9771) -> sex (1250840)
create implication male_penetrating_female (338619) -> sex (1250840)
create implication male_penetrating_intersex (13900) -> sex (1250840)
create implication male_penetrating_male (231041) -> sex (1250840)

Reason: A character penetrating another character should be regarded as sex.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1767 (forum #323490) has been rejected by @faucet.
Please go support topic #30736 instead.

I feel like you could have something like, a doctor puts a tongue depressor in your mouth as being penetration, but the wiki for penetration says that yes, penetration is supposed to apply specifically to sexual situations.

matrixmash said:
I feel like you could have something like, a doctor puts a tongue depressor in your mouth as being penetration, but the wiki for penetration says that yes, penetration is supposed to apply specifically to sexual situations.

that would probably be a tag like tongue_depressor_in_mouth or similar wording.

faucet said:
The bulk update request #1767 has been rejected.

create implication female_penetrating_female (3109) -> sex (1250840)
create implication female_penetrating_intersex (386) -> sex (1250840)
create implication female_penetrating_male (5861) -> sex (1250840)
create implication intersex_penetrating_female (21839) -> sex (1250840)
create implication intersex_penetrating_intersex (6943) -> sex (1250840)
create implication intersex_penetrating_male (9771) -> sex (1250840)
create implication male_penetrating_female (338619) -> sex (1250840)
create implication male_penetrating_intersex (13900) -> sex (1250840)
create implication male_penetrating_male (231041) -> sex (1250840)

Reason: A character penetrating another character should be regarded as sex.

aren't these all already implicated to *_penetrating tags, which is in turn implicated to penetration, which is implied to sex?

volteer133 said:
aren't these all already implicated to *_penetrating tags, which is in turn implicated to penetration, which is implied to sex?

Penetration never implied sex.

This BUR duplicates topic #31792 topic #30736. The older one also includes the ambiguous tags.

matrixmash said:
This BUR duplicates topic #31792. The older one also includes the ambiguous tags.

did you perhaps mean to put a different topic number there?

volteer133 said:
aren't these all already implicated to *_penetrating tags, which is in turn implicated to penetration, which is implied to sex?

Penetration doesn't imply sex because you can penetrate yourself, or be penetrated by an object. The same apparently goes for *_penetrated (although the wiki says otherwise) which was why my previous BUR was rejected.

matrixmash said:
This BUR duplicates topic #31792. The older one also includes the ambiguous tags.

That link goes to this BUR, I assume you mean to link somewhere else.

The bulk update request #1767 (forum #323490) has been rejected by @faucet.