Topic: Thinking with portals BUR

The bulk update request #2562 has been rejected.

Reason: Non-euclidean sex and masturbation are forms of sex and masturbation.

Fellatio is a form of sex.

Portal fleshlights, panties, amputations, etc are unusual applications of portals that can be present without portals themselves being visible.

ㅤportal_quadruple_amputation is more in line with other portal tags.

Portal prosthetic can only be called so when attached to a portal amputee.

Portally amputated bodyparts can only be stored if they're amputated. (There might be a name better than portal_storage)

I thought about making a distinction between portal amputee and amputation, but:

• It's a constant process - limbs easily go in and out unless firmly secured (as long as portal is active😈).
• Not enough posts.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2562 (forum #336091) has failed: Error: portal_strapon already implies thinking_with_portals through another implication (create implication portal_strapon -> thinking_with_portals)

EDIT: The bulk update request #2562 (forum #336091) has failed: Error: portal_strapon already implies thinking_with_portals through another implication (create implication portal_strapon -> thinking_with_portals)

EDIT: The bulk update request #2562 (forum #336091) has been rejected by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #2563 is active.

create implication portal_mask (102) -> mask (65049)
create implication portal_gag (49) -> gag (58609)
create implication portal_panties (677) -> panties (186633)
create implication portal_penis (584) -> penis (1907162)
create implication portal_saddle (4) -> saddle (3824)

Reason: (continued from original post)

EDIT: The bulk update request #2563 (forum #336092) has been approved by @Millcore.

The bulk update request #2564 is active.

create implication portal_fleshlight (808) -> penetrable_sex_toy (10566)
create implication portal_strapon (56) -> strapon (13506)
create implication portal_strapon (56) -> portal_dildo (66)
mass update portal_penis -> portal_dildo
create implication portal_dildo (66) -> portal_penis (584)
create implication portal_dildo (66) -> dildo (96005)

Reason: Portal-ed sex organs are basically sex toys, but living. I suggest to treat them as scuh.

Currently most of portal_penises are actually portal_dildoes (they can be moved about freely). I suggest to move them into that category, and from then on tag any penis shoved in a portal (including stationary one) as portal_penis.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2564 (forum #336093) has been approved by @Millcore.

cough cough topic #33907 cough cough

gattonero2001 said:
cough cough topic #33907 cough cough

Funny that, I checked for duplicates when I started work on the project but that was around 8 hours ago.
Edit:
Here's the proof: post changes #1080892.
Should I remove these entries, or is it better to have a single big BUR instead of two smaller ones?

Anyone wants to say anything?
Well I guess I'll remove them (edit: duplicates from topic #33907).

waydence said:
Anyone wants to say anything?
Well I guess I'll remove them.

It takes time for the admins to go through the queue. There's nothing wrong with your BURs, just be patient please.

The bulk update request #2563 (forum #336092) has been approved by @Millcore.

The bulk update request #2564 (forum #336093) has been approved by @Millcore.

The bulk update request #2562 (forum #336091) has failed: Error: portal_strapon already implies thinking_with_portals through another implication (create implication portal_strapon -> thinking_with_portals)

The bulk update request #2562 (forum #336091) has failed: Error: portal_strapon already implies thinking_with_portals through another implication (create implication portal_strapon -> thinking_with_portals)

This has made portal_dildo imply portal_penis, which then trickles down into implying penis. This seems wrong, as dildo implies that it isn't a real penis.

The bulk update request #4266 has been rejected.

remove implication portal_dildo (66) -> portal_penis (584)

Reason: Dildos are not penises

EDIT: The bulk update request #4266 (forum #358896) has failed: Implication for portal_dildo not found

EDIT: The bulk update request #4266 (forum #358896) has been rejected by @faucet.

The tag implication portal_dildo -> portal_penis has been rejected by @Millcore.

The bulk update request #4266 (forum #358896) has failed: Implication for portal_dildo not found

The bulk update request #4266 (forum #358896) has been rejected by @faucet.

What happened, did I break something? Looking back, there are a few rather ambiguous tags, so I guess it's good.

portal_storage feels a bit vague imo, the current intent seems to bne to use it for bodypart storage, but at a first glance, it could be for regular, general-purpose storage of anything .3.

The bulk update request #6720 is active.

create implication non-euclidean_masturbation (650) -> masturbation (190063)
create implication portal_fellatio (39) -> fellatio (188601)
create implication portal_fellatio (39) -> portal_sex (1759)
create implication portal_cunnilingus (5) -> cunnilingus (42087)
create implication portal_cunnilingus (5) -> portal_sex (1759)
create implication portal_tribadism (1) -> tribadism (7021)
create implication portal_tribadism (1) -> portal_sex (1759)
create implication portal_fleshlight (808) -> thinking_with_portals (3387)
create implication portal_gag (49) -> thinking_with_portals (3387)
create implication portal_mask (102) -> thinking_with_portals (3387)
create implication portal_mouth (19) -> thinking_with_portals (3387)
create implication portal_panties (677) -> thinking_with_portals (3387)
create implication portal_penis (584) -> thinking_with_portals (3387)
create implication portal_saddle (4) -> thinking_with_portals (3387)
create implication portal_amputation (441) -> thinking_with_portals (3387)

Reason: Rewrite of the BUR above without the technical issue, as well as adding some additional portal tags found. I tried to avoid anything that was already implied in separate implication requests, will edit the BUR as needed.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6720 (forum #392144) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6720 (forum #392144) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #2562 (forum #336091) has been rejected by @slyroon.