Topic: Hugging body parts

The bulk update request #12172 is pending approval.

create alias hugging_legs (298) -> leg_hug (321)
create alias hugging_leg (138) -> leg_hug (321)
create alias hugging_belly (154) -> belly_hug (192)
create alias hugging_arm (83) -> arm_hug (98)
create alias hugging_breasts (44) -> breast_hug (98) # has blocking transitive relationships, cannot be applied through bur
create alias hugging_breast (5) -> breast_hug (98)
create alias boob_hug (5) -> breast_hug (98)
create alias hugging_head (26) -> head_hug (9)
create alias face_hugging (273) -> face_hug (9)
create alias hugging_tongue (55) -> tongue_hug (50)

Reason: Same meaning.

I see that pamadan had made an alias request 1 year ago, but I disagree with this alias request at topic #45898.

cabo27judy said:
I see that pamadan had made an alias request 1 year ago, but I disagree with this alias request at topic #45898.

I disagree with your disagreement. [bodypart]_hug can be ambiguous is whether it means being hugged by that [bodypart] or hugging that [bodypart]. For example, wing hug.
The precedent (as seen by the implications to hugging another) are to use hugging_*

Related: topic #45333 and topic #44317

The bulk update request #12175 is pending approval.

create alias leg_hug (321) -> hugging_legs (298)
create implication hugging_legs (298) -> hug (67835)
create alias hugging_leg (138) -> hugging_legs (298)
create alias belly_hug (192) -> hugging_belly (154)
create implication hugging_belly (154) -> hug (67835)
create alias breast_hug (98) -> hugging_breasts (44) # duplicate of alias #71892
create alias hugging_breast (5) -> hugging_breasts (44)
create alias boob_hug (5) -> hugging_breasts (44)
create implication hugging_breasts (44) -> hug (67835)
create implication hugging_breasts (44) -> breasts (2130236)
create alias head_hug (9) -> hugging_head (26)
create alias face_hug (9) -> hugging_head (26)
create alias face_hugging (273) -> hugging_head (26)
create implication hugging_head (26) -> hug (67835)
create alias tongue_hug (50) -> hugging_tongue (55)
create implication hugging_tongue (55) -> hug (67835)
create implication hugging_tongue (55) -> tongue (1048386)

Reason: I don't think we need to distinguish between hugging one leg or two
Hugging the face is still the same as hugging the head

Do we need the hugging_own_* and hugging_another's_* variants of these tags?

This feels like a hug(e) undertaking

The bulk update request #12176 is pending approval.

remove alias hugging_self (0) -> self_hug (458)

Reason:
Keeping consistency
followup:
alias self_hug -> hugging_self
imply hugging_self -> hug

The bulk update request #12177 is pending approval.

remove implication hugging_balls (160) -> hugging_another (10947)

Reason: You can hug your own right?

followup:
imply hugging_balls -> hug

The bulk update request #12178 is pending approval.

remove implication hugging_butt (752) -> hugging_another (10947)
remove implication hugging_from_behind (5004) -> hugging_another (10947)

Reason: The more controversial unimplications. You could theoretically hug your own butt / hug from behind if you're really long

followup:
imply hugging_from_behind -> hug
imply hugging_butt -> hug

Oh and one last question, should wing hug stay as is, or be changed to hugged by wings?

The bulk update request #12180 is pending approval.

remove implication wing_hug (290) -> wings (489428)
remove implication wing_hold (36) -> wings (489428)
create implication using_wings (344) -> wings (489428)

Reason: Tangential BUR while we're at it
Rerouting the implication to using_wings (if you're using wings, wings must be present (i hope))

#

snpthecat said:
Oh and one last question, should wing hug stay as is, or be changed to hugged by wings?

Maybe the latter, if we're aliasing x_hug to hugging_x it'd be confusing that wing_hug specifically means something different than the others. Or perhaps hugging_with_wings.

snpthecat said:
Rerouting the implication to using_wings (if you're using wings, wings must be present (i hope))

Using wings sounds like a weird tag. A character that's flying or stretching their wings can be said to be "using their wings", so it's not really clear where the distinction is.