Topic: grouping tag for Monster Hunter armor

The bulk update request #12639 is pending approval.

create implication armor_(mh) (1) -> monster_hunter (20974)
create implication rathalos_armor (141) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication zinogre_armor (25) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication nargacuga_armor (83) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication anjanath_armor (28) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication rathian_armor (15) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication odogaron_armor (22) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication kirin_armor (151) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication wroggi_armor (13) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication kulve_taroth_armor (22) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication mizutsune_armor (10) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication legiana_armor (8) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication agnaktor_armor (6) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication tobi-kadachi_armor (17) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication kamura_armor (369) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication wiggler_head (26) -> armor_(mh) (1)

Reason: After I saw the tagging for armor of monsters was all over the place, I took some time and tried to tag the most popular ones correctly.
Now, I feel like there should be a tag to group all of them.
Please give me feedback if armor_(mh) fits, or if armor_(monster_hunter) would be the better choice. I went with armor_(mh), to stay consistent with other tags like kirin_(mh) or leviathan_(mh).
Another point that should be discussed: Should armor_(mh) imply armor?

I've got a huge backlog of posts where I couldn't identify the armor in the image, if anyone wanna help, feel free to message me.

Bump, because I still think it's relevant. IMO, this BUR falls in line with
how outfits are already handled on this site, e.g. pirate_hat, mummy_wrappings, wetsuit, chef_hat etc.

My question would be why does Monster Hunter armor deserve a unique tag? My thought process is that if there's armor from MH in a post, then both the monster hunter and armor tags would apply. So if I wanted to search for posts that specifically had armor from MH in them I could just use monster_hunter armor.

Personally I think it'd be better to have them implicate the regular armor tag and monster hunter tag.

I'd confer with Ordinary's assessment; if you want to revise it, I'd say the following would be more consistent with how we handle these things.

imply rathalos_armor -> armor
imply rathalos_armor -> monster_hunter
imply zinogre_armor -> armor
imply zinogre_armor -> monster_hunter
imply nargacuga_armor -> armor
imply nargacuga_armor -> monster_hunter
imply anjanath_armor -> armor
imply anjanath_armor -> monster_hunter
imply rathian_armor -> armor
imply rathian_armor -> monster_hunter
imply odogaron_armor -> armor
imply odogaron_armor -> monster_hunter
imply kirin_armor -> armor
imply kirin_armor -> monster_hunter
imply wroggi_armor -> armor
imply wroggi_armor -> monster_hunter
imply kulve_taroth_armor -> armor
imply kulve_taroth_armor -> monster_hunter
imply mizutsune_armor -> armor
imply mizutsune_armor -> monster_hunter
imply legiana_armor -> armor
imply legiana_armor -> monster_hunter
imply agnaktor_armor -> armor
imply agnaktor_armor -> monster_hunter
imply tobi-kadachi_armor -> armor
imply tobi-kadachi_armor -> monster_hunter
imply kamura_armor -> armor
imply kamura_armor -> monster_hunter
imply wiggler_head -> armor
imply wiggler_head -> monster_hunter

...also, I must be missing something, because I have no idea what you're referring to with pirate_hat, mummy_wrappings, wetsuit, & chef_hat. 2 of them have no implications, & only one of them (chef_hat) has a relevant implication, & it just implies [[hat -> headwear -> clothing; there's nothing like chef_hat -> chef_apparel -> clothing that could be seen as similar to this.

I also question the need for an armor_(mh) umbrella tag since I don't think there are any other tags like it.
If you want to keep the armors "together" so that people are aware, you can list all of them down in a collapsible section on each of the tag's wikis.

Monster Hunter armor, Charizard kigurumis, and similar articles should probably have some kind of umbrella tag for clothes with a character's non-clothing features, instead of writing up anything MH-specific.

aacafah said:
...also, I must be missing something, because I have no idea what you're referring to with pirate_hat, mummy_wrappings, wetsuit, & chef_hat

I put these as an explanation for why I want to introduce tags for specific armor, sorry for the confusion.
I was looking at the way species are handled (like an graph of parent implications, if you know what I mean) and assumed it should be the same here; but I can understand if it should be handled the way you proposed

thegreatwolfgang said:
If you want to keep the armors "together" so that people are aware, you can list all of them down in a collapsible section on each of the tag's wikis.

I'll definitively take care of the wikis, when I'm sure that that what I'm doing here is up to standards! :>

The bulk update request #13382 is pending approval.

Reason: Correction of previous BUR, part 1

The bulk update request #13383 is pending approval.

create implication legiana_armor (8) -> armor (107255)
create implication legiana_armor (8) -> monster_hunter (20974)
create implication agnaktor_armor (6) -> armor (107255)
create implication agnaktor_armor (6) -> monster_hunter (20974)
create implication tobi-kadachi_armor (17) -> armor (107255)
create implication tobi-kadachi_armor (17) -> monster_hunter (20974)
create implication kamura_armor (369) -> armor (107255)
create implication kamura_armor (369) -> monster_hunter (20974)
create implication wiggler_head (26) -> armor (107255)
create implication wiggler_head (26) -> monster_hunter (20974)

Reason: Correction of previous BUR, part 2