Topic: Tag implication: missing_head -> headless

The tag implication #70691 missing_head -> headless is pending approval.

Reason: Any character that is missing it’s head (or can’t be seen in post) is by default headless

Though I think it’s redundant, should I alias it instead?

Preferably alias missing_head (73) -> headless (1.5k) since it has the same meaning and posts under these tags appear to be similar to each other

I could see that being an issue with a character that started out with more than one head, though that's a fringe case for sure.

The bulk update request #12823 is pending approval.

create alias missing_head (78) -> headless (1572) # has blocking transitive relationships, cannot be applied through bur

Reason: Alternative version

fuzzygears said:
I could see that being an issue with a character that started out with more than one head, though that's a fringe case for sure.

You have a good point there! Could be uncommon but it's a very understandable reason why the imply would best fit rather than an alias.