Topic: slim_* tags mega BUR

The bulk update request #12900 is pending approval.

create implication slim_male (10069) -> male (3095271)
create implication slim_female (5945) -> female (3090608)
create implication slim_andromorph (117) -> andromorph (31043)
create implication slim_gynomorph (147) -> gynomorph (241212)
create implication slim_ambiguous (189) -> ambiguous_gender (395112)
create implication slim_anthro (11623) -> anthro (4158901)
create implication slim_feral (121) -> feral (734945)
create implication slim_humanoid (1112) -> humanoid (544244)
create implication slim_human (501) -> human (456127)
create implication slim_male (10069) -> slim (41717)
create implication slim_female (5945) -> slim (41717)
create implication slim_andromorph (117) -> slim_intersex (196)
create implication slim_gynomorph (147) -> slim_intersex (196)
create implication slim_ambiguous (189) -> slim (41717)
create implication slim_anthro (11623) -> slim (41717)
create implication slim_feral (121) -> slim (41717)
create implication slim_humanoid (1112) -> slim (41717)
create implication slim_human (501) -> slim (41717)
create implication slim_intersex (196) -> slim (41717)
create implication slim_intersex (196) -> intersex (307950)

Reason: posts with slim_x must include at least a slim and x character

slim_andro/gyno/herm/maleherm should imply slim_intersex instead of implying slim directly.

improper/ redundant compounds

should all be aliased to slim instead

some recent related:
topic #46384
topic #44287
topic #45538
topic #46416

coffeeco said:
slim_andro/gyno/herm/maleherm should imply slim_intersex instead of implying slim directly.

updated

ryu_deacon said:
improper/ redundant compounds

should all be aliased to slim instead

some recent related:
topic #46384
topic #44287
topic #45538
topic #46416

honestly i don't understand why this is related because those topic seems to be made to stop one user from spamming ultra specific tags, while slim is not only a much less specific tag type, but is also used by more than one person (the tags that are more suspects are those with less than 100 posts which i've removed)

you_are_cool said:
updated

honestly i don't understand why this is related because those topic seems to be made to stop one user from spamming ultra specific tags, while slim is not only a much less specific tag type, but is also used by more than one person (the tags that are more suspects are those with less than 100 posts which i've removed)

It is not about just one user tagging things but the fact that such combination tags as these in general are discouraged, slim_human for example is no less improper than curvy_human, hourglass_figured_human or wide_hipped_human.

You are proving the problem that demonthedarkhound noted.

[...]
On the other hand, these tags might give users the idea to create even more wide_hipped_* tags or other combinations. I definitely see this going into the direction of tag bloat. I doubt we want all possible combinations of breast size and genders for example.
[...]

you_are_cool said:
Reason: posts with slim_x must include at least a slim and x character

You're missing slim_herm and slim_maleherm

also topic #60790

Also duplicate of topic #44972. You should check for that before making a suggestion. Use MetaSearch for aliases/implications and "Script" field in BUR listing for BURs.