Topic: Yu-Gi-Oh Melffy tags

The bulk update request #13060 is pending approval.

create implication melffy_mommy (30) -> melffy (0)
create implication melffy_rabby (9) -> melffy (0)
create implication melffy_catty (1) -> melffy (0)
create implication melffy_puppy (1) -> melffy (0)
create implication melffy_pinny (0) -> melffy (0)
create alias melffy_sealy (1) -> melffy_pinny (0)

Reason: Easier to look for the entire archetype
And the alias is the japanese translated name (left) and english one (right), I think it's only for this one.
Also I don't know if tags can exist with no image with them, so I only put existing ones.

create implication melffy_sealy (1) -> melffy (0)
create alias melffy_sealy (1) -> melffy_pinny (0)

It wouldn't make sense to create an implication for a tag that's aliased to another tag. The first one should be imply melffy_pinny -> melffy.

You can edit it here: BUR #13060

Ok thanks you, I edited it, I'm not sure which way should be the alias

minizarbi said:
Ok thanks you, I edited it, I'm not sure which way should be the alias

It's correct: melffy_sealy -> melffy_pinny

I haven't played Yu-Gi-Oh since long before the Melffy archetype came out, but as far as I'm aware, melffy_sealy isn't a thing. Presumably, someone just got confused while tagging, and incorrectly assumed melffy_pinny's name based on the other cards being named melffy_<animal>y. Since it's just one random mistag, it could also just be manually moved instead, but alias works too.

crocogator said:
Presumably, someone just got confused while tagging, and incorrectly assumed melffy_pinny's name based on the other cards being named melffy_<animal>y.

True, it does fit the pattern: pinniped-y. The incorrectness could very well be from the tagger not realizing that and using seal instead.