Topic: invalidate tail_hold

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

fluffysoup said:
May I ask why some have *_(disambiguation) but others don't?

I think most of the ones that don't are, like, fragments of tags rather than ambiguous tagnames. so, colour names like brown and black usually aren't ambiguous as much as they are just left there because someone pushed the spacebar when they should have typed _.

dba_afish said:
I think most of the ones that don't are, like, fragments of tags rather than ambiguous tagnames. so, colour names like brown and black usually aren't ambiguous as much as they are just left there because someone pushed the spacebar when they should have typed _.

I see. It's probably too tiring to list up all the brown_* on the brown entry and do the same for all the other colors.

fluffysoup said:
The bulk update request #13068 is pending approval.

remove alias tail_holding (0) -> tail_hold (315)

Reason: I'm a little confused because tail hold wiki entry is apparently used for disambiguation already but not invalidated.

Follow-up

alias tail_hold -> tail_hold_(disambiguation)
category tail_hold_(disambiguation) -> invalid

Currently looking into this but what could be the difference of tail_hold from holding_tail?

Edit: saw the tail_hold wiki and understand that it cannot just be aliased to holding_tail that easily!

Updated

spuriouszabaione said:
Currently looking into this but what could be the difference of tail_hold from holding_tail?

using the tail to hold an object or holding onto a tail.

dba_afish said:
using the tail to hold an object or holding onto a tail.

Good point there, never thought about the tail holding something. Thanks dba!