Topic: Tag implication: holding_chaos_emerald -> chaos_emerald

The tag implication #71990 holding_chaos_emerald -> chaos_emerald is pending approval.

Reason: This tag should imply when a character from the Sonic series is holding a Chaos Emerald.

The bulk update request #13702 has been rejected.

create implication holding_chaos_emerald (4) -> holding_gem (340)

Reason: I agree with cabo27judy, the chaos emerald is also a gem.

EDIT: The bulk update request #13702 (forum #486600) has been rejected by @Ichiko.

i don't think this tag ("holding_chaos_emerald") is necessary. something like chaos_emerald holding_object would work just as well

cseejay said:
i don't think this tag ("holding_chaos_emerald") is necessary. something like chaos_emerald holding_object would work just as well

I agree, it’s too specific since holding gem would be enough

The bulk update request #13707 is pending approval.

create alias holding_chaos_emerald (4) -> holding_emerald (0) # has blocking transitive relationships, cannot be applied through bur

Reason: Holding chaos emerald can be replaced with holding_ gem and chaos_emerald. Might want to let the imply holding_chaos_emerald -> chaos_emerald go through first.

The bulk update request #13708 has been rejected.

create alias holding_chaos_emerald (4) -> holding_gem (340)

Reason: Might want to let the implication holding_chaos_emerald -> chaos_emerald go through before this one.

EDIT: The bulk update request #13708 (forum #486692) has been rejected by @Dappe.

The bulk update request #13708 (forum #486692) has been rejected by @Dappe.

dappe said:
The bulk update request #13708 has been rejected.

create alias holding_chaos_emerald (4) -> holding_gem (340)

Reason: Might want to let the implication holding_chaos_emerald -> chaos_emerald go through before this one.

EDIT: The bulk update request #13708 (forum #486692) has been rejected by @Dappe.

Urm. Why did you reject it?

yummytummysketties said:
Urm. Why did you reject it?

It told me the alias was blocked in some way.

dappe said:
It told me the alias was blocked in some way.

It was probably blocked by the first 2 posts on this thread. Not that much of a problem if they got rejected.
If there is a problem, the system doesn't allow you to submit the request at all.

I would have upvoted your BUR btw.

The bulk update request #13711 is pending approval.

create alias holding_chaos_emerald (4) -> holding_gem (340) # has blocking transitive relationships, cannot be applied through bur

Reason: Alright, I'll post this again then.

Might want to let the chaos emerald implication go through first.

Did you accidentally hide the post?

Yeah it was blocked by the existing aliases, they will be rejected before your BUR would have been approved
You don't need to reject anything, it's just how the system works

https://e621.net/bulk_update_requests/13711
Assuming you didn't do it by accident, I have to say this: Please don't hide pending requests.

The bulk update request #13702 (forum #486600) has been rejected by @Ichiko.

yummytummysketties said:
https://e621.net/bulk_update_requests/13711
Assuming you didn't do it by accident, I have to say this: Please don't hide pending requests.

That's on the list of things to make impossible to do.

versperus said:
That's on the list of things to make impossible to do.

I tried for no less than a year to make it impossible to hide AIBUR requests, so good luck with that