Posts

[search help]

Layout Settings

Blacklisted
(help)
Artists
Copyrights
Species
General
Meta

Information

ID
557487
MD5
76ebd2c597166668e506ec4fb68d7c8b
Size
1280x1564 (835 KB)
Type
PNG
Status
Deleted
Rating
Explicit
Score
19
Faves
187 Show

Related

You can not view this image.

Children: 1 child (learn more) show »

This post was deleted or flagged for the following reasons:

Blacklisted
(help)
  • Comments
    •

    Chessax

    Privileged

    I'm getting rid of the pussy/female(/cuntboy) tags in favor of the cloaca/male tags for the following reasons:

    • This looks nothing like a pussy.
      • It's in the wrong location for that anyway.
    • No anus => not genital_slit either.
    • V-shaped torso (with lots of muscle).
    • Squarish/"rough" face.
    • The character is a scalie, but has nipples.
      • Implying male, since no mammaries.
  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    Sahlohkin

    Member

    Chessax said:
    I'm getting rid of the pussy/female(/cuntboy) tags in favor of the cloaca/male tags for the following reasons:

    • This looks nothing like a pussy.
      • It's in the wrong location for that anyway.
    • No anus => not genital_slit either.
    • V-shaped torso (with lots of muscle).
    • Squarish/"rough" face.
    • The character is a scalie, but has nipples.
      • Implying male, since no mammaries.

    honestly, if tag what you see is in effect, I just cover the genitals with a finger and guess for an ambiguous gender...then add ambiguous gender too.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    Chessax

    Privileged

    Sahlohkin said:
    honestly, if tag what you see is in effect, I just cover the genitals with a finger and guess for an ambiguous gender...then add ambiguous gender too.

    That's actually not a bad idea, at least when doing an initial estimate in ambiguous cases, and I wouldn't have too much problem with ambiguous, as long as this isn't tagged as female.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •