I've only ever seen this in a textbook. This is pretty neat.

lol

The faun/satyr is even anatomically correct!

See? Furry porn is not only ancient, but was even protomethian!

Morp said:
The faun/satyr is even anatomically correct!

Too bad there are hundreds of modern furry artists that cannot get it right. Hah. What does that say about us?

excuse me sir, you seem to have a goat on your dick

deadjackal said:
Too bad there are hundreds of modern furry artists that cannot get it right. Hah. What does that say about us?

"Ambiguous_gender" removed and "female" added.

Reminds me of my college days at Alabama State.

Actually, I believe this was but one, of many such statues/images, that were recovered from the 'Pompeii' site. (of which, an estimated 80% is still buried).
So 'Yes', Zoophilia (after a fact), is nothing new.

Colte

They probably had animal brothels in Pompeii (likes they do in Denmark nowadays).

Anyone know where I can get a replica please.

Sexuality was a lot more accepted in Pompeii than it is in modern society; I'd be willing to bet that the reason their anatomy is more correct is because the sculptors weren't just guessing like the modern furry artists, some of which are probably afraid to try to find real models/pictures.

How is this ancient furry art when its zoo?

I don't think we should be too condemning to modern furry artists. The artist most likely would have been paid a great deal of money (or whatever trade value they were using) to produce this sculpture. The quality of furry art today would go up if it was the furry artist's livelihood.

When this was discovered in the Bourbon excavations, it was promptly locked away and its existence denied to the general public.